CS301 GDB Solution 2024/ CS301 GDB 2024 / CS301 GDB Solution Spring 2024/CS301 GDB 2024 Solution

 

CS301 GDB Solution 2024/ CS301 GDB 2024 / CS301 GDB Solution Spring 2024/CS301 GDB 2024 Solution

 

For the given scenario of managing a library system for a college, I would choose a Linked List as the more suitable data structure.

 

Efficient Adding of Books:

 Linked lists offer efficient insertion of elements, especially when adding books one by one. Each new book can be added at the end of the linked list with constant time complexity, O(1).

 

Scalability:

 Linked lists can dynamically grow to accommodate new books without a fixed size constraint. This allows for managing a maximum of ten thousand books without worrying about preallocating a large array.

 

Less Chance of Book Deletion:

 As per the requirements, there is very less chance of deleting a book from the system. Linked lists offer efficient insertion and retrieval without the need for frequent deletion, making them suitable for this scenario.

 

Efficient Searching:

 Linked lists can efficiently support searching operations. While their time complexity for search is O(n) in the worst case, it's still practical for a library system managing a moderate number of books. Additionally, linked lists can be enhanced with techniques like indexing or hashing for faster search operations.

 

Overall, a linked list provides flexibility, efficient insertion, and moderate search performance, making it a suitable choice for managing a library system where books are added frequently and deletion is rare.